{"id":1536,"date":"2018-12-13T20:00:50","date_gmt":"2018-12-13T12:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/?p=1536"},"modified":"2018-12-13T20:35:59","modified_gmt":"2018-12-13T12:35:59","slug":"najibs-kangaroo-court-must-be-investigated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/?p=1536","title":{"rendered":"Najib\u2019s Kangaroo Court must be investigated"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kuala Lumpur, Dec 13 &#8211; The acquittal of <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">former managing director of Maxbiz Corp Bhd Datuk Vincent Leong Jee Wai and substantial shareholder Datuk Andrew Leong Wye Keong yesterday was not reported by many news but it can mark a significant sign of change in the country\u2019s judiciary. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Vincent who is said to be related to an MP of Pakatan Harapan, and close to a former UMNO politician and Andrew who has history with the opposition going back to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theedgemarkets.com\/article\/cover-story-shareholders-galvanised-action\">Reformasi days<\/a>, were both charged with insider trading in May 2017. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whilst no one reported back then that their prosecution were politically-motivated (possibly due to fear of the then government Barisan Nasional), many in the business world knew that the charges were political.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court discharged and acquitted both of them on Oct 17, following after the Attorney General, Tommy Thomas, who decided not to pursue the case after finding little grounds for the charges.<\/span><\/p>\n<h5><strong>Speculative and circumstantial evidence<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thestar.com.my\/business\/business-news\/2018\/12\/12\/ex-maxbiz-md-shareholder-acquitted-of-insider-trading-charges\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Star<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> reported on Dec 12 that in dropping the charges against the accused parties, Thomas said there were two reasons for his decision:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> There was publicly available information at the time of each disposal which could rationally justify each disposal made by the second accused.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> There is insufficient evidence in any event that the first accused (Vincent) communicated any insider information to the second accused (Andrew). The evidence is speculative and circumstantial \u2013 it would not suffice to justify a conviction on a criminal burden.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe accused parties apparently communicated constantly between July 8, 2010 and Feb 10, 2011 &#8211; their communication immediately prior to each disposal was therefore not out of character in their relationship,<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8220;Certainly, it would be nigh impossible to convict on a &#8216;beyond reasonable doubt&#8217; standard of proof.&#8221; Tommy Thomas was quoted by the daily.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tommy\u2019s statement begs for a huge question that no one seems to be asking. If it would be nigh impossible to convict on a \u2018beyond reasonable doubt\u2019 standard of proof, then why were they even charged in the first place? Was there prima facie?<\/span><\/p>\n<h5><strong>SC must be investigated for these prosecutions<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Is this not proof that there were malfeasance in the act of charging them? It can\u2019t simply be incompetence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Kangaroo Court of the Securities Commission headed by former Chairman Tan Sri Ranjit Ajit Singh and prosecution team must had known that the evidence they had, were not of the standard of \u2018beyond reasonable doubt\u2019. And yet they were going after many opposition-friendly businessmen in helping alleged-kleptocrat Datuk Seri Najib Razak to stay in power via weakening the support of Pakatan from the business world.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1544\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1544\" style=\"width: 522px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1544\" src=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Ranjit-SIngh-and-Najib-Razak.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"522\" height=\"354\" srcset=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Ranjit-SIngh-and-Najib-Razak.jpg 522w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Ranjit-SIngh-and-Najib-Razak-300x203.jpg 300w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Ranjit-SIngh-and-Najib-Razak-147x100.jpg 147w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Ranjit-SIngh-and-Najib-Razak-350x237.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 522px) 100vw, 522px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1544\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Former SC Chairman Tan Sri Ranjit Ajit Singh with former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Is it mere coincidence that the Najib&#8217;s administration were going after Pakatan-friendly businessmen? NMT think not because there were other cases that if SC were to apply the same method of prosecuting, they should have prosecuted companies like 1MDB but they did not.<\/p>\n<p>Another case NMT highlighted recently was Top Glove, where its chairman Tan Sri Lim Wee Chai sits on the Board of Employees Provident Fund but at the same time EPF became the largest <a href=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/2018\/11\/13\/rm800-million-of-epf-money-in-najibs-political-appointees-company\/\">institutional investor<\/a> in Top Glove. Why was there no charges or investigations against them? Lim was proven to be a supporter of Najib as we had reported in our <a href=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/2018\/12\/07\/top-glove-chairman-associated-honesty-and-integrity-with-najib\/\">article dated December 7<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h5><strong>Selective prosecutions on Pakatan-friendly businessmen<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NMT had previously highlighted few cases of politically motivated charges, and this Maxbiz case is among them. Other cases we highlighted were Kencana Petroleum (linked to Mokhzani Mahathir), Kosmo Technology (linked to Mukhriz Mahathir), and Supermax duo, Datuk Seri Stanley Thai Kim Sim and Datin Seri Cheryl Tan Bee Geok.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NMT took a close look at Datin Seri Cheryl\u2019s case and learned that the evidence used to convict her were telco phone records between her and her sister. Such regular phone calls are not out of character in any sibling-relationship, let alone when there were family urgency around that time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">No call recordings or any other evidence that proved that non-public information was communicated between them, and that made the phone logs evidence speculative and circumstantial, creating reasonable doubt and therefore making the conviction questionable.<\/span><\/p>\n<h5><strong>Support opposition and suffer backlash<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Cheryl\u2019s husband, Stanley Thai on the other hand, came out strongly in support of Pakatan Rakyat during the run up to the 13th General Election in 2013. <\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1543\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1543\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-1543 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Stanley-supporting-Pakatan-Rakyat-1.jpg\" alt=\"Datuk Seri Stanley Thai openly supporting Pakatan Rakyat during GE13\" width=\"800\" height=\"597\" srcset=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Stanley-supporting-Pakatan-Rakyat-1.jpg 800w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Stanley-supporting-Pakatan-Rakyat-1-300x224.jpg 300w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Stanley-supporting-Pakatan-Rakyat-1-768x573.jpg 768w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Stanley-supporting-Pakatan-Rakyat-1-134x100.jpg 134w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Stanley-supporting-Pakatan-Rakyat-1-350x261.jpg 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1543\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Stanley Thai openly supporting Pakatan Rakyat during GE13<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That act to support the then opposition was repaid not-so-kindly by the Barisan Nasional government with insider trading charge and he was later convicted, fined and sentenced to prison for 5 years. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Both husband and wife\u2019s cases are on appeal but with this latest development of Maxbiz, perhaps we can expect to see the prosecution taking proper &#8216;Rule of Law&#8217; approach.<\/span><\/p>\n<h5><strong>Some judges are central to many politically-linked cases<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The case of <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thesundaily.my\/archive\/1980469-ISARCH396555\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kosmo Technology<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> was last reported in May this year where the directors who were acquitted in September 2016 of submitting false company report to Bursa, were ordered to enter defence after Judge Azman Abdullah <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">allowed the prosecution&#8217;s appeal to set aside the Sessions Court&#8217;s decision to acquit.\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Judge Azman Abdullah is a High Court judge who is central to many politically-linked cases.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This happened after the 14th General Election but before Tommy Thomas was appointed as AG in June. NMT will report further on the development of the case in future.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1547\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1547\" style=\"width: 326px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-1547 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Mokhzani-and-KC-Yeow.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"326\" height=\"363\" srcset=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Mokhzani-and-KC-Yeow.png 326w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Mokhzani-and-KC-Yeow-269x300.png 269w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Mokhzani-and-KC-Yeow-90x100.png 90w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 326px) 100vw, 326px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1547\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Mokhzani Mahathir and KC Yeow<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Another case that seemed politically-motivated was the case of Kencana Petroleum a company previously linked to Mokhzani Mahathir. Former Prime Minister Najib had also in the past attacked Mokhzani out in the open saying that he bagged billions worth of contracts from Petronas.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThat is fake news. SapuraKencana was only set up in 2012. My father was no longer the PM then. It was Najib who was the PM at that time. My father was only the advisor to Petronas but there is a board of directors. I was not the major shareholder of then SapuraKencana. You are saying the contracts were given when there is a board chairman that reports to you, and you did not know? I don\u2019t understand,\u201d Mokhzani was quoted saying by <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theedgemarkets.com\/article\/mokhzani-says-najibs-claim-he-bagged-billionringgit-petronas-contracts-sapurakencana-fake\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The EdgeMarkets<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in May this year.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But in Najib\u2019s defense, he is famous for saying \u201cI don\u2019t know\u201d, and that is absolutely beyond reasonable doubt.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1550\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1550\" style=\"width: 981px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-1550 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Najib-Razak-saya-tak-tahu.png\" alt=\"&quot;Saya tak tahu&quot; - Datuk Seri Najib Razak\" width=\"981\" height=\"637\" srcset=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Najib-Razak-saya-tak-tahu.png 981w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Najib-Razak-saya-tak-tahu-300x195.png 300w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Najib-Razak-saya-tak-tahu-768x499.png 768w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Najib-Razak-saya-tak-tahu-154x100.png 154w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Najib-Razak-saya-tak-tahu-350x227.png 350w, https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Najib-Razak-saya-tak-tahu-800x519.png 800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 981px) 100vw, 981px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1550\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">&#8220;Saya tak tahu&#8221; &#8211; Datuk Seri Najib Razak<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In July 2016, the Securities Commission <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sc.com.my\/news\/media-releases-and-announcements\/sc-charges-former-executive-director-of-kencana-petroleum-for-insider-trading\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">charged former Executive Director of Kencana Petroleum Bhd<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, and two other individuals with insider trading. Yeow Kheng Chew (Yeow), 64, was charged at the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for acquiring 1,159,000 shares on 8 July 2011 whilst in possession of inside information.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These charges were read out before Sessions Court Judge Tuan Zulqarnain Bin Hassan, a Sessions Court judge who is also central to many politically-linked cases, including the Supermax duo and Maxbiz.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The case was withdrawn according to reports in August 2017 under the instruction of the then AG, <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theedgemarkets.com\/article\/insider-trading-charges-against-kc-yeow-withdrawn-under-ags-instruction\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tan Sri Apandi Ali<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. NMT could not confirm the reason for withdrawing the charges. We are however very sure that the case was never one that could be proven beyond reasonable doubt.<\/span><\/p>\n<h5><strong>Get Out of Jail Deals<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Coincidentally, sources revealed that a close confidante of Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor and a young lawyer, were at the time running a scheme using the name and influence of Rosmah and Apandi, to sell deals deals akin to \u201cGet-Out-Jail-Card\u201d costing millions transacted outside of Malaysia to keep businessmen out of jail. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Another source revealed that one \u2018money game\u2019 company paid hundreds of millions to avoid criminal charges.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">-NMT<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kuala Lumpur, Dec 13 &#8211; The acquittal of former managing director of Maxbiz Corp Bhd&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1540,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41,21,23],"tags":[2728,3684,3682,3683,3681,2729,2112,721,634,3685],"class_list":["post-1536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business","category-crime","category-scandal","tag-apandi-ali","tag-azman-abdullah","tag-kencana-petroleum","tag-kosmo-technology","tag-maxbiz","tag-ranjit-ajit-singh","tag-securities-commission","tag-supermax","tag-tommy-thomas","tag-zulqarnain-hassan"],"featured_image_urls":{"full":["https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Kangaroo-Court.png",1123,739,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Kangaroo-Court-150x150.png",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Kangaroo-Court-300x197.png",300,197,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Kangaroo-Court-768x505.png",640,421,true],"large":["https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Kangaroo-Court-1024x674.png",640,421,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Kangaroo-Court.png",1123,739,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Kangaroo-Court.png",1123,739,false],"newsium-slider-full":["https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Kangaroo-Court.png",1123,739,false],"newsium-featured":["https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Kangaroo-Court.png",1024,674,false],"newsium-medium":["https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Kangaroo-Court.png",720,475,false]},"author_info":{"info":["Editor"]},"category_info":"<a href=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/?cat=41\" rel=\"category\">Business<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/?cat=21\" rel=\"category\">Crime<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/?cat=23\" rel=\"category\">Scandal<\/a>","tag_info":"Scandal","comment_count":"0","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1536"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1536\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1559,"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1536\/revisions\/1559"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1540"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newmalaysiatimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}